Who We Are: A Statistical Self-Portrait of the Dynamics CRM User Group

At the December meeting of the Dynamics CRM User Group, I announced and encouraged members to fill out an online survey. It was a pretty simple survey, with questions on where members are located, what job roles they hold, what kind of organizations they work for, and the like. I also wanted to use the survey to get some guidance on what kinds of session topics were more (or less) popular.

The survey questions were pretty simple, but I thought the results were interesting. In the month after the session, we got 23 respondents, and I will report the aggregated results in this article.

From a Dynamics CRM perspective, the interesting thing about the survey is that I implemented it within Dynamics CRM. The step-by-step how-to of implementing a survey in Dynamics CRM is actually quite interesting, and absolutely worth a separate article.

For now, the actual survey results will have to suffice, so here you go!

What Certifications Do We Have?

We are definitely a well-certified group. I asked which of the Dynamics CRM 4.0 core certification exams people had passed, and here are the results:

whoweare-certs

70% of us have passed the Applications exam, 48% the Customization exam and 39% Installation/Deployment. The Applications exam was by far my favorite, too: In fact, I liked it so much I took it twice!

 

Where Do We Live?

 whoweare-live

Wow. 17% of us are from Europe or Asia-Pacific., and a bare plurality from my home time zone.

Who Do We Work For?

whoweare-work

That’s a good mix: two-thirds of us almost equally split between end-customers and MS partners with the rest from ISVs, non-MS partner consulting firms and the “other” category.

What Do We Do?

 whoweare-do

Not surprising that a majority of our members are IT Professionals, but I was pleasantly surprised with how well sales, marketing and management are represented.

What Kinds of Presentations Do We Want?

 whoweare-presentations

These are averages of all responses. The three options were each ranked on a 1-5 scale, 1 being “Most preferred”, 5 least. No doubt Edward Tufte would object to my graphical display of the quantitative information in question, and he’d be right. But I wasn’t thinking that far ahead. So just remind yourself that the average of “2″ for Technical sessions indicates a higher preference than the “2.95″ for Introductory.

1 Comment »

  1. Andriy a33ik Butenko Said,

    January 15, 2010 @ 12:49 pm

    Very interesting article. I’m appreciated for this statistics.

Leave a Comment